New iPod shuffle requires extra adapter for third-party headphones

Posted on March 11, 2009. Filed under: Gadget News | Tags: , , |

By Nilay Patel, Engadget


We were wondering why the new voice-enabled iPod shuffle even has a standard 3.5mm headphone jack since it’s controlled by proprietary headphones, and we just got the answer: non-Apple headphones will require a special dongle that includes the new three-button controller, and Apple says it’s working with third parties to bring other compatible ‘phones to market. Yes, Apple’s cheapest iPod is now the most needlessly complex, and far from cost-effective if you want to use your own cans: assuming the adapter will cost between $20 and $30 like most other Apple accessories, you’re looking at minimum $100 outlay for the new shuffle, and at that point you might as well pick up a $150 iPod nano, which is also VoiceOver-enabled in addition to having twice the storage, dongle-less controls, a screen, and numerous other features. We’ll see if this thing is so tiny these concerns wash out when we get one in our hands, but does anyone actually feel like the numbers tip in favor of the shuffle here? We’re all ears.

Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

2 Responses to “New iPod shuffle requires extra adapter for third-party headphones”

RSS Feed for I Am Rajendra – Watch The World With Me….. Comments RSS Feed

hi guys…….i am happy to see you here. u have Nice Blog Thank for sharing article with me
Do you want buy ……..iPoD…….? If u want please join visit me >>> iPod Shuffle for Sale

Very interesting post I enjoy your website keep up the amazing posts.

Where's The Comment Form?

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: